以下内容来源自
http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page,由GOOGLE翻译。
Good Vs. Evil
Good characters and creatures protect innocent life. Evil characters and creatures debase or destroy innocent life, whether for fun or profit.
“Good” implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of sentient beings. Good characters make personal sacrifices to help others.
“Evil” implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient. Others actively pursue evil, killing for sport or out of duty to some evil deity or master.
People who are neutral with respect to good and evil have compunctions against killing the innocent but lack the commitment to make sacrifices to protect or help others. Neutral people are committed to others by personal relationships.
Being good or evil can be a conscious choice. For most people, though, being good or evil is an attitude that one recognizes but does not choose. Being neutral on the good–evil axis usually represents a lack of commitment one way or the other, but for some it represents a positive commitment to a balanced view. While acknowledging that good and evil are objective states, not just opinions, these folk maintain that a balance between the two is the proper place for people, or at least for them.
Animals and other creatures incapable of moral action are neutral rather than good or evil. Even deadly vipers and tigers that eat people are neutral because they lack the capacity for morally right or wrong behavior.
良好的VS。邪恶
良好的人物和动物保护无辜的生命。邪恶的人物和动物的贬低或破坏无辜的生命,无论是为乐趣或利润。
“好”意味著利他主义,尊重生命,关注众生的尊严。良好品格作出的个人牺牲来帮助别人。
“恶”意味著伤害,压迫和杀害他人。一些邪恶的生物,根本没有对他人的同情和杀害无疑虑,如果这样做是方便。其他积极追求邪恶,杀害运动或出一些邪恶的神或主责任。
反对杀害无辜的人是善恶的中性的内疚,但缺乏承诺作出牺牲以保护或帮助他人。中立的人都致力於给他人的个人关系。
善或恶,可以有意识地选择。不过,对於大多数人来说,是善或恶,是一种态度的人认识到,但不选择。良好的邪恶轴心中性通常代表缺乏承诺的一种方式或其他,但对一些人来说是一个积极承诺一个平衡的观点。同时也承认,善恶是客观的状态,不只是意见,这些民间认为,两者之间的平衡,是在适当的地方的人,或至少他们。
动物和其他动物的道德行为不能是中性的,而不是善或恶。甚至是致命的毒蛇和老虎吃人是中性的,因为他们缺乏道义上是正确的或错误的行为能力。