craft吧 关注:64贴子:259

回复:vsrt文献-翻译

取消只看楼主收藏回复

Sample Results:
Malus’ Law using 12GHz radio waves
Right Polarizer ‐ Horizontal
I(max) = 160
Angle [°] Signal Fit=I(max)*cos²θ
0 162 160
10 159 155
20 126 141
30 109 120
40 86 94
50 60 66
60 55 40
70 31 19
80 18 5
90 7 0
Malus' Law Testing using 12GHz radio waves
Right Polarizer ‐ Horizontal
I(max) = 160
Angle [°] Signal Fit
0 162 160
10 159 155
20 126 141
30 109 120
40 86 94
50 60 66
60 55 40
70 31 19
80 18 5
90 7 0
Malus' Law: I = Io*cos²θ


IP属地:北京57楼2012-07-16 16:20
回复
    Interference Method to Measure
    the Wavelength of Radio Waves
    http://cord.org/step_online/st1-4/st14eiii2.htm
    Purpose:
    Measurement of the wavelength of DirecTV radio waves (f~12GHz) by
    examining the interference pattern from a double source (acting as a double slit).
    Student Info:
    1) Designed for Physics (11/12)
    2) Prior Knowledge: Graphing, Functions, Trigonometry, Interference Equation,
    Wave Superposition, Young’s Double Slit Measurement of Light’s Wavelength
    3) Suggested Websites:
    http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/schroedinger/two-slit2.html
    http://en.wiki.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
    Teacher Info:
    1) Prior Knowledge: VSRT Operation, Young Double-Slit Experiment
    2) Vocabulary: Constructive and Destructive Interference, Baseline, Order Number
    3) Suggested Website(s): Same as Above
    Time Required:
    1) Setup ≈ 10 min 2) Activity/Lab ≈ 40 min
    3) Data Analysis ≈ 40 min 4) Discussion/Wrap Up ≈ 20 min
    Materials Needed:
    1) VSRT System (See Appendix I)
    2) 2 CFL Radio Wave Sources & a meterstick (100cm) or a ruler (30cm)


    IP属地:北京58楼2012-07-16 16:21
    回复
      ~ 6 inch LNBF separation ~ 24 inch LNBF separation
      Procedure:
      1) Place bulbs nearly 4 feet from the LNBF’s, at the same height above the floor as
      the detectors. The distance from the CFLs to the LNBFs is (s) in the calculations.
      2) Place bulbs as close to each other as possible (about 4.5 inches, depending on how
      they are secured). The separation distance is (a) in the calculations.
      3) Place the detectors 4 inches from each other (4” measured from center-to-center
      of the LNBFs). The separation between the LNBFs is (y) in the calculations.
      4) Record the average power (the unit is Kelvin).
      5) Increase the distance between the LNBFs in ½ inch steps, collect data & record.
      6) Repeat Step #5 until at least 4 readings (2 inches) beyond the minimum (1st null).
      7) It is possible to measure the 1st order maxima (y ~ 12 inches), but measuring
      higher (2nd or more) order minima and maxima become more difficult.
      y
      a
      s
      3
      Data Table:
      LNBF Separation
      “y” in [inches] *Power [K]
      LNBF Separation
      “y” in [inches] * Power [K]
      4
      4.5 12.5
      5 13
      5.5 13.5
      6 14
      6.5 14.5
      7 15
      7.5 15.5
      8 16
      8.5 16.5
      9 17
      9.5 17.5
      10 18
      10.5 18.5
      11 19
      11.5 19.5
      12 20
      * - See Basic VSRT Operation for discussion of Power [K]
      Graphing: Graph the data (Power [K] vs. LNBF separation [inches].
      Diagram for Calculations:
      http://cord.org/step_online/st1-4/st14eiii2.htm


      IP属地:北京59楼2012-07-16 16:21
      回复
        Calculations:
        Due to the destructive interference condition, the 1st minimum occurs at
        ½ λ = a * sin(θ) => λ = 2 a * sin (θ) where θ = tan-1 ( y / s)
        Example: For this setup, y = 6” and s = 48” so θ = tan-1 ( 6” / 48”) = 7.1°
        λ = 2 a * sin (θ) = 2 * 4” * sin(7.1°) = 0.99”
        (Using c (3.0x108 m/s) = λf => λ = c/f = (3x108m/s)/(12GHz)=2.5cm~0.98”
        Questions:
        1) What is the wavelength of the radio wave detected by the LNBFs?
        2) What is the theoretical distance to the first minima for this wavelength (2.5 cm)
        for this source separation and distance from the stationary LNBF?
        3) What is the percent difference between the theoretical position of the null and the
        measured position?
        4) What can you say, based on your measurements, regarding the validity of the
        interference equation (m + ½) λ = d sin θ.
        5) How many wave cycles does a wave go through from the CFLs to the stationary
        LNBF detector at the minima position? (Hint: measure the distance between)
        6) How many wave cycles would a wave from the CFLs go through to arrive at the
        movable LNBF detector (same as #5)? (Hint: measure the distance between)
        7) Are your results from #5 & #6 in agreement with the expected path-length
        difference ?
        8) The LNBF is rated to have an uncertainty of 1GHz. What degree of uncertainty
        does this introduce into our wavelength and frequency assumptions?
        9) Could you also perform the same experiment keeping the distance to the LNBFs
        fixed and changing the distance between the lamps? In this case, predict the lamp
        separation for the 1st and 2nd nulls when the detectors are placed 9 inches apart?


        IP属地:北京60楼2012-07-16 16:21
        回复
          Student Info:
          1) Designed for Physics (11/12)
          2) Prior Knowledge: Graphing and Right Angle Trigonometry
          3) Suggested Website(s)
          http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14e/singleslit.htm
          Teacher Info:
          1) Prior Knowledge: VSRT Operation, Solar Width ~ 0.5° ~ 30 minutes
          2) Vocabulary: Single Slit Diffraction, Airy Pattern & Bessel Function
          3) Suggested Website(s)
          http://en.wiki.org/wiki/Single_slit_diffraction
          Time Required:
          1) Setup ≈ 30 min 2) Experiment ≈ 60 min
          3) Data Analysis ≈ 20 min 4) Discussion / Wrap Up ≈ 30 min
          Materials Needed:
          1) VSRT System (See Appendix I)
          2) Dual LNBFs with 6 feet BNC Cables (Same Length for Interferometer)
          3) Two (2) DirecTV Parabolic Dishes with Alignment Mirrors, and a Sunny Day!
          4) Tape Measure (at least 12feet long), 2 Long Level Tables or flat ground/sidewalk
          2
          Procedure:
          1) Starting with a baseline (separation) of 6 feet between the parabolic dishes,
          point each dish by aligning the reflection of the mirror on the leftmost LNBF.
          **Note: For best results, the imaginary line connecting the two LNBFs should be
          perpendicular to the Sun, so the setup may need to be rotated to “track” the Sun.
          2) Measure the system power [K] from 6 feet to roughly 2 or 3 feet beyond the
          minimum reading in 6 inch increments and record in the data table below.
          Data Table:
          Power [K]
          Baseline [ft] Trial #1 Trial #2 Trial #3 Avg Power [K]
          6
          6.5
          7
          7.5
          8
          8.5
          9
          9.5
          10
          10.5
          11
          11.5
          12
          12.5
          13
          13.5
          14
          Graphing:
          1) Make a graph of Average Power [K] vs. baseline [ft].
          2) Sketch a curve of best fit through the data with careful detail near the
          minimum point (near 10 feet).
          3
          Simulated Wave Pattern and Diagram for Single Slit Diffraction:
          The computer simulation on the left shows a plane wave encountering a single slit
          whose width is approximately 4 times the wavelength ( a ≈ 4λ ). The diagram on the
          right shows the geometrical derivation for determining the relationship between the slit
          width (a), the distance between the slit and viewing screen (D), the location of the
          minima (y) and the angle (θ) connecting them.
          Calculations:
          Recall the wavelength of the radio waves as measured in the previous experiment.
          1) From the destructive wave condition for the minima (m=1), the equation
          a sin θ = m λ can be arranged for sin θ = λ / a, where a = baseline.
          2) For small angles (<5°) , the sin θ ≈ θ, so the above equation simplifies to
          θ = λ / a. Calculate this result: θ = 1” / 126” = 0.0079 rad = 0.45°
          Questions:
          1) Estimate the Sun’s angular diameter by recalling that when your fingers are
          held an ar***ength away (~100cm), the diameter of your fingernail (~1cm)
          blocks the Sun ( θ ≈ 1cm / 100cm = 0.01rad = 0.57°). Note: The 12GHz radio
          width should be larger than the visible light width – See VSRT Memo#030.
          2) Compare your results from the calculation section to the result from question
          #1. Which is larger/smaller and what is the % difference between them?
          Additional Activities:
          1) Measurement of Sun’s Visible Angular Width using small aperture hole
          projected onto a viewing surface. For example, at a distance of 1m (~3ft) the
          spot size is roughly 9mm (~3/8”) and will scale linearly for longer distances.
          2) A better approximation for this measurement is to treat the Sun as a circular
          aperture, so the aperture has fringe minima which satisfy the Airy condition,
          θ = 1.22 λ / a, which is a 22% increase in the apparent solar diameter.
          3) The shape of the power vs. baseline curve is found by calculating the visibility
          integral which results in a first order Bessel Function. While this is beyond
          the scope of this project, interested teachers and students can work with the
          EXCEL file attached at the end of the unit.


          IP属地:北京61楼2012-07-16 16:22
          回复
            ANGULAR WIDTH of the SUN Data Analysis
            Method for 1st Order Bessel Function Fit
            1) Input Various Sun Diameter and Peak Intensity Guesses (Blue & Yellow Highlighted Boxes)
            Peak Intensity = 280
            Sun Angle [min] = 33 Converted half‐angle [rad] 0.00480
            baseline [inch] baseline[cm] Power [K] B = 2pi*(½angle)*baseline/2.5cm Bessel Fit (delta^2)/fit
            22.5 57 281 0.6894 263.69 1.136
            36 91 215 1.1030 239.52 2.510
            48 122 205 1.4707 210.82 0.161
            60 152 158 1.8384 177.25 2.090
            72 183 123 2.2061 140.91 2.276
            84 213 93 2.5737 104.01 1.165
            96 244 61 2.9414 68.65 0.853
            108 274 24.5 3.3091 36.71 4.062
            120 305 8 3.6768 9.67 0.287
            132 335 8.5 4.0444 11.46 0.766
            144 366 17.5 4.4121 26.19 2.883
            156 396 21 4.7798 34.54 5.309
            168 427 24 5.1475 37.04 4.588
            180 457 19 5.5151 34.58 7.020
            192 488 17.5 5.8828 28.37 4.167
            Error sums 39.3
            Sun Angle [min] Best I(max) Error Sum #1 Error Sum #2
            28 280 214 4495
            29 280 225 2795
            30 280 113 1600
            31 280 102 930
            32 280 58.4 449
            33 280 39.3 251
            34 280 44.8 348
            35 280 39.8 471
            36 280 50.5 651
            37 280 103 961
            baseline [inch] Power [K] Bessel Fit
            22.5 281 263.69
            36 215 239.52
            48 205 210.82
            (delta^2)/(fit/10)^2 60 158 177.25
            0.379 72 123 140.91
            1.301 84 93 104.01
            0.081 96 61 68.65
            1.484 108 24.5 36.71
            2.120 120 8 9.67
            1.401 132 8.5 11.46
            1.574 144 17.5 26.19
            24.840 156 21 34.54
            4.340 168 24 37.04
            12.161 180 19 34.58
            24.657 192 17.5 28.37
            41.587
            29.501
            67.245
            38.605
            251
            0
            50
            100
            150
            200
            250
            300
            0 50 100 150 200
            P
            o
            w
            e
            r
            [
            K]
            Fringe Baseline [inch]


            IP属地:北京62楼2012-07-16 16:22
            回复
              Acknowledgements:
              We would like to sincerely thank all the people at MIT Haystack Observatory who were
              involved in our experience as we developed these units over the past two summers. Those people
              include:
              Madeleine Needles, Preethi Pratap, Divya Oberoi, Rich Crowley, John Foster, Phil Shute, Heidi
              Johnson, KT Paul, Phil Erickson, Anthea Coster, Shep Doeleman, Janet Dutton, Michael Albu,
              Lynn Matthews, Diane Auger, Dan Smythe, Susan Davis, Arthur Niell, Mindy Lekberg, Vincent
              Fish, Martina Arndt, Mary Altenhof, and Colin Lonsdale.
              And above all: Alan Rogers for providing the patience, insight, and guidance that has been so
              helpful.
              As well as the workshop participants who provided constructive feedback after using the
              equipment and lessons.
              Julie Farhm, David Kasok, Aaron Keller, Sara Kate May, Hannah Neville, John Pickle,
              Christopher Siren, Steve Stephenson, Scott Stief, William Toomey, Steve Vandergrift, Joe
              Zahka.
              2007 RET’s: Alan Chuckran, & Bob Hill
              2009 RET’s: Dan Costa, & Jessie Cadigan


              IP属地:北京63楼2012-07-16 16:22
              回复
                全文完


                IP属地:北京64楼2012-07-16 16:23
                回复
                  翻页


                  IP属地:北京65楼2012-07-16 16:24
                  回复