桑兰诉讼案跟网友们的切身利益最相关联的莫过于酱豆证。先前海明签署了15张酱豆证。把酱豆一号颁发给了大名鼎鼎的周立波。引起全球华人集体瞩目。
根据徐晓冰的新诉状，酱豆证又增加了新名额。共有30名。显然徐晓冰将至少签发15张以上新的酱豆证。由于酱豆被正式列入新诉状第十二项被告，可以预期酱豆们将在适当时间收到法院船票。请予以关注，以免错失登船时间。
一、什么是酱豆。
5. DOES 1-30 are individuals or business entities of unknown identity or form or identified by fictitious names that participated in the activity which is the subject of this action.
酱豆是以不明身份或虚构的名字参与了本案所指控的行为的个人或企业。
二、酱豆有效期
“诽谤”型（偷懒、政治避难等）的酱豆：有效期自2011年一月至五月。
网络骚扰型酱豆：长期有效。
其他酱豆过期处理。报废。
三、酱豆之罪过
“诽谤”型（偷懒、政治避难等）酱豆
186. The Lius’ statements were published on the blogs and broadcast over the internet by the Lius and re-broadcast by others, including Does 1-30, from January through May 2011. Defendant Liu and Gina Liu together with Does 1-30 communicated with Plaintiff anonymously through a website maintained and managed by Sinovision. In particular, Defendant Liu’s statements were published in his blog on Sinovision’s blog site, devoted mostly if not exclusively to spewing vulgar, obscene, and derogatory remarks or blogs designed to cast Plaintiff in a false light. Sinovision’s site was dominated by the Lius and the Lius’ alleged “supporters”, who derived pleasure in ‘trolling’ or ‘flaming’ by posting inflammatory, demeaning, insulting, and harassing comments or messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response and to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm Plaintiff.
网络骚扰型酱豆（十一大罪状）
194. After Plaintiff demand for accounting of funds and her properties, and the disputes with the Lius over the Lius’ fiduciary duty became public, in addition to making false and defamatory statements online, the Lius and Does 1-30 began publishing blogs and articles on Sinovision’s blog site, devoted mostly if not exclusively to spewing vulgar, obscene, and derogatory remarks or blogs designed to cast Plaintiff in a false light. Sinovision’s site was dominated by the Lius, Does 1-30 and the Lius’ alleged “supporters”, who used pseudo or fictitious names and derived pleasure in ‘trolling’ or ‘flaming’ by posting anonymously inflammatory, demeaning, insulting, and harassing comments or messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response and more importantly to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm Plaintiff.
195. The Lius and Does 1-30 employed tactics and trolling practices, taunting Plaintiff and her friends in an emotional response to the insulting remarks, a designed effect produced by such trolling practice.


196. At some time, presently unknown to Plaintiff, and continuing to the present, on information and belief, the Lius and Does 1-30 knowingly and willingly conspired and agreed with the Lius and with each other to engage in a scheme to cyberharass Plaintiff with intent to annoy, intimidate, threaten and alarm Plaintiff by using with trolling and inflaming statements containing vulgar, obscene, derogatory, demeaning, insulting, and harassing remarks.
197. The Lius and Does 1-30 did the acts and things alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of, the conspiracy and above-alleged agreement.
198. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the last overt act in pursuance of the above-described conspiracy occurred on or about and shortly after the date of filing of the Complaint, as the Lius and Does 1-30 continued to communicate with Plaintiff through online blogs anonymously.
199. On information and belief after (incomplete) investigation and inquiry, the pseudo names or online fictitious names (and English transliteration) used by the Lius and Does 1-30 include the following: 孙鹰(Sun Ying), 卓玛(Zuo Ma), 毛茂(Maomao). They are among the persons who anonymously post salacious and disparaging statements to annoy, harass, threaten and alarm Sang Lan and her relatives.
200. On information and belief after investigation and inquiry, the online blogger using the anonymous identity known as “Sun Ying”, believed to be used by Liu, frequently incited and inflamed the online community by his incendiary and outrageous remarks designed to expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt or to induce an unsavory opinion of Plaintiff in the minds of a substantial number of individuals in the community. Sun Ying’s statement specifically decried Plaintiff as person of immoral turpitude and to disparage her as incapable of holding a job, due to laziness and greed.
201. Several bloggers have threatened to cause physical and bodily harm to Plaintiff if and when Plaintiff visits New York.
202. On information and belief, the Lius and several bloggers met frequently with blog administrators or executives of Sinovision to coordinate the publications of blogs.
203. The Lius and anonymous Does continuously wrote, blogged and posted comments with malice with singular design to subject Plaintiff to public ridicule and humiliation, to ruin Plaintiff’s reputation and professional career, to expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt or to induce an unsavory opinion of Plaintiff in the minds of a substantial number of individuals in the community, and with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm Plaintiff anonymously through a website maintained and managed by Sinovision.
204. Plaintiff, her parents and her friends were victims of trolling. They are being tormented by the Lius and Does 1-30, whose activity and conduct harassed, annoyed, and threatened and alarmed Plaintiff and her family. Plaintiff and her family live in constant fear, heightened anxiety, pain, and mental anguish, subject to ridicule and humiliation as result of these salacious and insulting attacks by the Lius and Does 1-30.
根据第200 款，孙鹰已被认定是刘国生。
另外，根据第202款，美中网被指定为酱豆发酵地点。或许可称为酱豆缸。
法律说明：本文英文部分全部如实转载。中文翻译如有搞笑纯粹为周末娱乐，轻松一下。绝无对案情的任何一方有偏袒之意。


其实徐晓冰并没有拿出客观证据，比如IP等，只是写了句“根据有关信息我们相信....”，估计也就是根据黄本科的“两孔法”得出的结论。
我感觉徐晓冰并没有去进行调查，只是拿着以前海明的证据以及桑兰、黄健的口述就洋洋洒洒的写了这第四版的诉讼书，黄健还曾在痛骂杨明的同时洋洋得意的让被告好好想想怎么写答辩状。
目前的形式是，还有桑黑继续在美中网、桑兰吧猖獗；而桑粉们全部和路平一样神秘消失。而徐晓冰的诉状只是比海明的比出了几倍的文字，内容却没有什么变化。虽然又把时代华纳提了上来，却并没有提供关键证据，比如卡特的录像带、罗马尼亚教练的证词，甚至连这两人在哪都不知道.....
只能说，看戏党很失望，等了几个月只是要看一场重播。

看看娘娘能养大棚多久.