前些天看C. S. Lewis的Mere Christianity看到这段，如醍醐般：
The niceness, in fact, is God*s gift to you, not your gift to God.
Of course, He regards a nice nature as a good thing - good like bread, or sunshine,
or water. But these are the good things which He gives and we receive. He created
your sound nerves and good digestion, and there is plenty more where they came
from. It costs God nothing, so far as we know, to create nice things: but to convert
rebellious wills cost His crucifixion.
Christ said *Blessed are the poor* and *How hard it is for the rich to enter the Kingdom,*
and no doubt He primarily meant the economically rich and economically poor. But do
not His words also apply to another kind of riches and poverty? One of the dangers of
having a lot of money is that you may be quite satisfied with the kinds of happiness
money can give and so fail to realise your need for God. If everything seems to come
simply by signing cheques, you may forget that you are at every moment totally
dependent on God. Now quite plainly, nature gifts carry with them a similar danger.
If you have sound verves and intelligence and health and popularity and a good
upbringing, you are likely to be quite satisfied with your character as it is. *Why drag
God into it?* you may ask. A certain level of good conduct comes fairly easily to you.
Your are not one of those wretched creatures who are always being tripped up by
sex, or dipsomania, or nervousness, or bad temper. Everyone says you are a nice
chap and (between ourselves) you agree with them. You are quite likely to believe
that all this niceness is your own doing: and you may easily not feel the need for
any better kind of goodness. Often people who have all these natural kinds of
goodness cannot be brought to recognise their need for Christ at all until, one day,
the natural goodness lets them down and their self-satisfaction is shattered. In other
words, it is hard for those who are *rich* in this sense to enter the Kingdom.

Off Plus Camera独立电影节
《举手之劳》Little Favour剧组问答会

Little Favour是BC自己公司出品的一个short film短片，大约20分钟。

iTunes上这部片子卖$2.99，实在不贵，就买了来看。
很不错的短片，诚意之作。
真正热爱这门艺术的人做出来的东西才能打动别人。
我们票房动辄几亿一部的电影市场，什么时候才能不再是烂片当道？

看完两遍时写的几句
OLLA唯爱永生4月25号在这儿上映，连着两个星期五都去看了。如果没有Tom的解释，大概会觉得2个多小时沉闷的不知道在讲什么。听了他这么多美得让人想哭的访谈，真的觉得电影很唯美很浪漫很感人哎。看来美是一种教育，需要有敏感细腻又善表达的人引领。
这个周末又看了一遍。

最近因了锦官的推荐在看《战长沙》，真的很不错哎。
今天剧吧看剧评，狠狠地洒了一把泪。

抽空看了几个战长沙剧宣的访谈，杨家小姑娘难得的口齿清楚，表达流畅。

Tom Hiddleston #Ice Bucket Challenge

BC #Ice Bucket Challenge

可怜的孩子被浇了六次。

Pastor Ken回来了。

Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred . . . let me sow love
Where there is injury . . . pardon
Where there is doubt . . . faith
Where there is despair . . .hope
Where there is darkness . . . light
Where there is sadness . . .joy
Divine Master,
grant that I may not so much seek
To be consoled . . .as to console
To be understood . . .as to understand,
To be loved . . . as to love
For it is in giving . . .that we receive,
It is in pardoning, that we are pardoned,
It is in dying . . .that we are born to eternal life

这两天边干活边把<战长沙>喜欢的段落挑出来看。
看到18集，姐夫的穿针引线，爸爸的成事不足，两个人的告白和分离，拍的真美。
美剧英剧看多了，爱情故事多半是直白的。
很久没看过这种柔情深种欲语还休的戏码，弄的一整天都沉浸在温柔又伤感的情绪里。

今晚艾米奖颁奖，《神探夏洛克》赢了7项奖
“Sherlock” stars Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman shocked the crowd at
the Nokia Theater by winning lead and supporting actor in a movie or miniseries.
“Sherlock” also beat “Normal Heart” and “Fargo” contenders in the longform writing
category, with Steven Moffat recognized for his take on Arthur Conan Doyle’s
durable sleuth. “This is utterly thrilling,” Moffat said.
Also：
cinematography
picture editing
music composition
sound editing

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2965161945
【会战长沙】青山处处皆忠骨——《战长沙》34位配角一一道来
这个看得我哭得犀利哗啦。
群戏，谈不上是配角，很多人的戏份比顾清明要多。
硬讲起来，应该湘湘和小满是主角吧。

http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3019619358
【会战长沙】战火玫瑰 科普《战长沙》中 顾氏夫妻的爱情线
这个做的挺细的。
这部剧里的顾清明胡湘湘，姐姐姐夫，小满秀秀几对的爱情故事我都喜欢。
只可惜图不是高清的。