呀我艹！本来想发在埃博拉吧来着！发到这里来了！

算了，我科普一下埃博拉，反正求精

西非地区愈演愈烈的埃博拉疫情至今仍无缓解趋势。据利比里亚媒体的消息，该国近日竟出现两名感染埃博拉病毒被确诊死亡的妇女“诈尸”的离奇一幕。（东莱）
下葬途中忽然醒来
28日，英国《镜报》援引当地《宁巴省新黎明报》的消息指称，这两名“诈尸”的女性分别是40多岁的奎伊和60多岁的凯贝，两人都来自宁巴省。
其中最不可思议的是，凯贝在被医生宣布“死亡”前两天，一直没有得到任何食物和医疗，只是在家中静躺。当她被亲属们送去埋葬时，她忽然在途中苏醒过来。凯贝和奎伊目前的身体状况看起来并无异样，她们也能在人群中到处走动。
当地民众对此感到极为恐慌。利比里亚媒体称，这是当地第一次出现埃博拉死者“诈尸”的情况。目前在西非抗击埃博拉一线工作的28岁英国医生约翰逊解释说，部分埃博拉死者确实会出现死前仍然看似健康，并可以四处走动，但不久之后病情却急转直下。
疫区流行“阴谋论”
这两位女性的“诈尸”也给当地流传的阴谋论增添了新“论据”。
国际慈善组织上个月的一项调查显示, 利比里亚有92%的民众不相信埃博拉病毒的存在。事实上，许多首都居民一开始就认为，所谓“病毒”不过是政府为了得到援助资金而设下的一个骗局。部分民众即使接受了利比里亚卫生部的建议远离死者和病患，但依然对此心存疑虑。他们怀疑这场灾难源于某种“诅咒”，或是有人为了争夺土地而在饮用水中投毒，因此并不积极将患病的亲友送医救治。
利比里亚北部城镇科拉洪甚至发生了居民设置路障拦截并袭击医疗救助人员的事件。即使民众承认埃博拉病毒的存在，他们也不信任卫生机构的医疗水平。医护人员感染病毒的报道更加重了民众与医疗机构接触的恐惧。
目前发生疫情的这几个西非国家，大多是刚刚经历过内战，当地民众不信任政府，又对现代医学存有戒心。不少当地人质疑隔离措施是当地政府的阴谋，企图把不同部族的人士带到隔离设施内杀害。这种想法令不少患者拒绝接受隔离甚至在隔离后逃走。
将有百万人死于埃博拉？
世卫最新疫情数据显示，截至9月26日，自年初埃博拉疫情暴发以来，全球因感染埃博拉病毒死亡的人数已经超过3000人。
截至9月23日，利比里亚、几内亚、塞拉利昂等国累计发现埃博拉病毒确诊、疑似和可能感染病例6574例，死亡3091人，其中利比里亚死亡1830人，几内亚648人，塞拉利昂605人。
世卫称，一些民众不敢去医院，或医疗机构因负荷过大而无法收治所有患者，实际感染人数可能更多。美国疾病预防控制中心估计，在2015年1月以前，会有140万人死于埃博拉病毒。（美国你就扯淡吧）

死亡3083人 感染6553（话说Terrys特工识别号不就是6553么）人

我还以为埃博拉病毒是你们随便瞎掰的....

还是顶一下吧，埃博拉这东西太恐怖了

长知识，话说终于有救药了啊

发一张埃博拉拟人图

up

气死英语不好系列
Ebola is the result of bio-terrorism experiments gone wrong, according to a tenured professor at Delaware State University.
In an article published in a major Liberian newspaper, The Daily Observer, the Liberian-born Cyril Broderick claims the epidemic is the result of work done by the U.S. Department of Defence, among others.
His remarks can only make the task of those fighting to control the outbreak harder, as they feed into the superstition and misinformation circulating about Ebola and how it is spread.
While some readers commenting on the article were critical, the number who praised it was telling.
“They are using” Ebola, wrote one, “for culling the world population mainly Africa for the … purpose of gaining control of the Africans resources criminally.”
The piece purports to describe scientific findings from various “reports,” which are not cited in detail, and even references the bestselling thriller, The Hot Zone.
“Reports narrate stories of the US Department of Defence (DoD) funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone,” wrote Prof. Broderick.
Under the headline, “Ebola, AIDS Manufactured by Western Pharmaceuticals, US DoD?” he claims, “the U.S., Canada, France, and the U.K. are all implicated in the detestable and devilish deeds that these Ebola tests are. There is a need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages.”
The article suggests groups trying to stop the epidemic — Centres for Disease Control, the World Health Organization and Doctors Without Borders — are all somehow in on it. The piece puts them on a list of those “implicated in selecting and enticing African countries to participate in the testing events.”
Prof. Broderick defended his article in a brief interview with The Washington Post.
“There are many references to what was contained in my letter,” he said. “You may read the letter and double-check the sources listed. They are available and legitimate.”
But are they? Prof. Broderick drew on research published in several conspiracy websites, including Global Research and Liberty Beacon. He discussed a 1996 book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola — Nature, Accident or Intentional? by Leonard Horowitz, who called himself a “humanitarian, clinician, prophet, scholar and natural healer.”
Another of his sources said Tulane University, which once worked on test kits for hemorrhagic fever in West Africa, has “been active in the African areas where Ebola is said to have broken out in 2014.”
Prof. Broderick declined to answer whether he is concerned his article, published in Liberia’s Ebola-devastated capital, would convince locals Western doctors are trying to harm them.
“I refer you to the articles and reports published,” he said. “I hope you can understand them. They are unambiguous. I am happy that our government has taken the lead in counteracting the infection to curtail the infections and death.”
Prof. Broderick’s employer is refusing to intervene.
“The university is not going to abridge his First Amendment rights to give his opinion about the issues of the day,” said Carlos Holmes, a spokesman for the school.
“Dr. Broderick’s comments have nothing to do with any research that is taking place at Delaware State University … He’s a plant scientist and there’s no research like that relating with pathogens and viruses taking place .”

非洲黑人还不能死光，要为我过老老实实在非洲挖矿