Some conclud that college students should bear expenses for their higher leaaring on the generalization that college garduates usually receive higher lalaries for similar jobs than those without a college degree .We cannot deny that higher lever of education ,indeed, does associate with better income .Still ,built on such the fact alone ,the conclusion remains questionable when more aspects are taken into consideration .
The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher education make more money than those less well—educated.But salary or income is ,in most cases ,based on contributions made by employees to companies or organizitions in which they are employed. Statistics in the market indicate that pelope with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue—collar workers who do not have college degrees are becoming the hotties in the market.Employers prefer to hire pay more to highly skilled and specially trainde pelope rather than fresh college graduates.In the auto industry ,for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times more than their collge—educated couterparts who make the average salaries in other companies.And it is wildely acceptted that pelope’s income is determined more by talent, hard work ,and willingness to take risks solely by certain qualifications such as collge education.Otherwise , the unemployment rate of collge graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labor market.Admettedly in some knowledge extensive fields such as rearshing ,teaching ,and practice of law the labor force are primarily consisted of highly educated professionals.But such pelope make up only a fraction of the labor maket and thus unpresentive of the whole employment in general .
Considering the goal of education ,we find that it is even more problematic for the responsibility of financing college education to college students.The goal of education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force ,thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy .As tax payers . parents all contribute to the education system and country in various ways .It i only reasonable and necessary that the country gives some forms of financially assistanc to students to ease the burden of rising education costs.Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstanding students from affluent backgrounds.Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from millions of families to engage in higher level of study.It is understandable that the general quality of pelope in a coutry will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow .
If the buden of supporting children’s higher education is dumped on parents and students ,thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to purse their academic inspiration.Among those who dsufer would definitely be future great scientists,business managers,aritists and statesman .The loss will be disastrous anf irreversible.
The whole argument in question rests on an assumption that it is always the case that people with higher education make more money than those less well—educated.But salary or income is ,in most cases ,based on contributions made by employees to companies or organizitions in which they are employed. Statistics in the market indicate that pelope with professional training tend to find jobs easier than college graduates do and that blue—collar workers who do not have college degrees are becoming the hotties in the market.Employers prefer to hire pay more to highly skilled and specially trainde pelope rather than fresh college graduates.In the auto industry ,for instance, skilled technicians make two or three times more than their collge—educated couterparts who make the average salaries in other companies.And it is wildely acceptted that pelope’s income is determined more by talent, hard work ,and willingness to take risks solely by certain qualifications such as collge education.Otherwise , the unemployment rate of collge graduates would not be increasing every year and the rule of supply and demand will lose much of power in controlling the labor market.Admettedly in some knowledge extensive fields such as rearshing ,teaching ,and practice of law the labor force are primarily consisted of highly educated professionals.But such pelope make up only a fraction of the labor maket and thus unpresentive of the whole employment in general .
Considering the goal of education ,we find that it is even more problematic for the responsibility of financing college education to college students.The goal of education of a nation is to improve and strengthen the general level of intellectual and professional capacity of its labor force ,thereby increasing the competency of the nation in the global economy .As tax payers . parents all contribute to the education system and country in various ways .It i only reasonable and necessary that the country gives some forms of financially assistanc to students to ease the burden of rising education costs.Such help should go to not only students from needy or impoverished families but also outstanding students from affluent backgrounds.Doing so can significantly boost the motivation of children from millions of families to engage in higher level of study.It is understandable that the general quality of pelope in a coutry will improve and its economy will benefit both now and in years to follow .
If the buden of supporting children’s higher education is dumped on parents and students ,thousands of brilliant students will be deprived of chances to purse their academic inspiration.Among those who dsufer would definitely be future great scientists,business managers,aritists and statesman .The loss will be disastrous anf irreversible.
