#84.Re:#82.
They make me sick too.
So we have heard about a lot of the Han equipment, what of the Romans? How will the Han formation fare against pilums thrown at them, possibly killing many? (since they wear scale armor, and assuming the Romans could get close enough to use their pilums) How about siegecraft, How will Chinese cities fare against Roman sieges and Roman cities fare against a Chinese army? I think the Chinese would have an advantage in siegecraft, I*m not sure if mongonels were invented at this time, but to my knowledge Chinese architects built siege engines very suitable and powerful for siegecraft.
武士刀我也不喜欢。
我们已经讨论了一大堆汉朝的装备了,说说罗马的怎么样?当汉朝的军阵面对罗马特制标枪的攻击时会发生什么?(假设他们身穿鳞甲且已经进入标枪的射程)。双方各自的城墙能否承受住对方攻城器的进攻?我知道汉朝在攻城器械方面有优势,我不知道当时有没有投石车,不过汉朝设计的攻城器械确实好用。
#85.
I thought the katana and wakibasih were Japanese. Why are we talking about them? The katana is supposed to have a molecular blade, and both Japanese swords are made with highly advance metallugury skills. The Japanese learned their metallgury skills from the Chinese, who also made very good swords, just in different styles and designs. Europe didnt* have metallgury technology until long after the Chinese started using it.
我想武士刀既然是从日本来的,我们为什么要讨论他们?武士刀就像光剑一样锋利,所有的日本刀都采用先进的萃取技术冶炼而成。当然,这个技术是从中国学习来的。中国人造的剑同样出色,只不过2者的造型设计不同罢了。直到中国掌握萃取技术很久之后欧洲才学会它。
#86.Re:#84.
I think Chinese siege weapons are better. Roman balistas cannot destroy Chinese walls (If you see how think Chinese walls are).
Pilums, I heard they are very good. But how can they be strong when people use arms to throw spears?
中国的攻城器械更好,罗马的弹射装置奈何不了中国的城墙(只要你见过中国的城墙有多厚就明白了)。
特制标枪,听说很好用,但是都是靠胳膊投掷出去的,又能强多少呢?
They make me sick too.
So we have heard about a lot of the Han equipment, what of the Romans? How will the Han formation fare against pilums thrown at them, possibly killing many? (since they wear scale armor, and assuming the Romans could get close enough to use their pilums) How about siegecraft, How will Chinese cities fare against Roman sieges and Roman cities fare against a Chinese army? I think the Chinese would have an advantage in siegecraft, I*m not sure if mongonels were invented at this time, but to my knowledge Chinese architects built siege engines very suitable and powerful for siegecraft.
武士刀我也不喜欢。
我们已经讨论了一大堆汉朝的装备了,说说罗马的怎么样?当汉朝的军阵面对罗马特制标枪的攻击时会发生什么?(假设他们身穿鳞甲且已经进入标枪的射程)。双方各自的城墙能否承受住对方攻城器的进攻?我知道汉朝在攻城器械方面有优势,我不知道当时有没有投石车,不过汉朝设计的攻城器械确实好用。
#85.
I thought the katana and wakibasih were Japanese. Why are we talking about them? The katana is supposed to have a molecular blade, and both Japanese swords are made with highly advance metallugury skills. The Japanese learned their metallgury skills from the Chinese, who also made very good swords, just in different styles and designs. Europe didnt* have metallgury technology until long after the Chinese started using it.
我想武士刀既然是从日本来的,我们为什么要讨论他们?武士刀就像光剑一样锋利,所有的日本刀都采用先进的萃取技术冶炼而成。当然,这个技术是从中国学习来的。中国人造的剑同样出色,只不过2者的造型设计不同罢了。直到中国掌握萃取技术很久之后欧洲才学会它。
#86.Re:#84.
I think Chinese siege weapons are better. Roman balistas cannot destroy Chinese walls (If you see how think Chinese walls are).
Pilums, I heard they are very good. But how can they be strong when people use arms to throw spears?
中国的攻城器械更好,罗马的弹射装置奈何不了中国的城墙(只要你见过中国的城墙有多厚就明白了)。
特制标枪,听说很好用,但是都是靠胳膊投掷出去的,又能强多少呢?