On the JP100 whine - they plan to nerf it!!
-We don’t, reducing alpha dmg is not always a nerf, T-34-85 at tier6 with 100mm gun was horrible, with 85mm it’s the best medium.
关于百突的抱怨：他们准备锉百突！
答：我们没有这打算，砍单发伤害不并一定是削弱。6级的T-34-85装100炮时是渣渣，装85炮时是最好的中坦。

Q: Is there a chance that we will see the M60A1 introduced into the tech tree for the USA, to help update it a bit to a current standard of other nations with vehicles from the 1960's (T-62A, Leopard 1, AMX-30B, ect.). As well as make the US tier 10 medium competitive with other nations.
-Not A1:)) smth else, I really want to improve US med line.
问：有没有可能把M60A1引入美系科技树？引入1960年代的车（T-62A、豹1、AMX-30B等），以现在的标准来升级一下美系科技树。同时也能让美系10级中坦能和其他国家的相抗衡。
答：不。不过我确实想改进一下美系中坦线。

Q: Is there an option to get the MERDC pattern added for the USA vehicles, or an early variant of it like the MASSTER pattern (AKA 7th Army Camo), if not 1 MERDC pattern per environment.
-No idea about that, TBH
问：有没有可能为美国车引入MERDC迷彩涂装。或者在没用对应环境的图案时，采用它的某种早期型号，比如MASSTER迷彩（也叫第七军迷彩）。
答：说实话，我对此不了解。

How about taking away RNG from shell pen and damage? It would make this game competitively sound to a point and will be esports viable, as of now there is too much RNG for anyone to call themselves "professional players" of WoT.
-I’ll look into that.
问：移除穿深和伤害的随机浮动会如何呢？在某种程度上可以让游戏更具有竞技性，适合于电竞。而目前随机性太大，谁都可以说自己是“专业选手”。
答：我会去看一下。

What happened to the other supertest tanks like the Steyr WT and the Rhm. Skorpion?
-We’ll use them in 2016 at some point.
问：还有一些超测车辆是什么情况，比如斯太尔运载车和莱茵蝎式。（译注：什么情况？支付宝啊）
答：我们会在2016年的某个时间用到它们。

Could you ask what will become of super high alpha tanks like jaegeroo, waffen and death star? I hope they get slightly nerfed in a way...
-JP100 will be fine, less alpha, more gun comfort, the tank concept is sound and I don’t want to nerf it. WT100 will be replaced. 183mm guns will be reworked with new HESH.
问：对于单发伤害超高的车会如何处理？比如百突、百运和183，我希望能略锉一下。
答：百突会没事的，会砍单发，加强炮控，这车的概念没问题，我不想削弱它。百运要替换掉。183的炮要重制，以使用新的HESH机制。

"The two answers regarding map rotation and corridors"
-We need to remove shitty maps, including low tier maps, Mittengard!
-We will change maps, starting with removal of corridor ones.
In my opinion, this wouldn't leave much maps untouched in the process.
-Yes, too many bad maps, I don’t want to keep them.
问：关于地图循环轮转有两个说法，一个是：我们要移除渣地图，包括低级地图，密特朗。另一个说法是：我们会修改地图，从移除走廊式地图开始。在我看来，这样搞的话，没多少地图不受影响。
答：是的，太多的渣地图了。我不想保留这些地图。

"How about just decreasing the damage of prem. ammo by 50% .<snip>"
-No. Rebalancing prem ammo is okay tho. Things like 420 pen HEAT will have to go away.
Q's: Can Slava explain on this? It is a bit contradicting to read 'no' followed by 're-balancing prem ammo is okay'. What did he have in mind, what direction?
In which direction should we, us players, be thinking in regards to your vision on how this is could be rebalanced?Ó
-Reduction of dmg of premium ammo? I don’t like the idea of ruining premium ammo, that’s what these “let’s nerf gold dmg by 30-50%” questions are – some people ask us to take away gold ammo one way or another. Gold ammo for silver is important part of game economy.
So the idea is that premium ammo is a better ammo. Does better always mean more penetration? No, it doesn’t.
Options:
More pen or more dmg or faster speed or more crits or…there are many options.
For example, Su100Y already has different gold ammo – more dmg one. For some tanks we can go that way, why not?
问：原来有人问把金币弹的伤害砍掉50%如何，回答是不。然后又说再平衡金币弹是没问题的，比如420穿的HEAT要滚蛋。斯拉瓦能解释一下吗？这看起来有点自相矛盾，先说不，然后又说没问题。到底是怎么想的？我们玩家该如何理解你关于再平衡的想法。
答：砍金币弹伤害？我不喜欢这个主意，这样的想法，比如“把金币弹伤害砍掉30-50%”，会毁了金币弹。还有些人要求我们移除金币弹，但银换金是游戏经济系统的重要组成部分。想法是这样的，金币弹是更好的弹药。但更好是不是就意味着更高的穿深？不。还有其他选项，更高穿深、或更大伤害、或者是更快速度、或者是更大模块伤害，有很多选项。比如说，SU-100Y已经有了不同的金币弹，更大的伤害。有些坦克也可以这样设计，为什么不呢？

I want to suggest 2things
1.durring the European community contributer thing (Cyprus meeting), the question of testing tanks came out, but no one from wg or YouTube knew how to implement it. I came up with the idea of lending tanks. I want their opinion on this. I got alot of good feedback from players on the thread.
-Lending? Not sure what you mean. I know how to test tanks. :)
We need a public test realm which is almost always on and we can test new tanks or features there, the way WoW does that.
问：我有2个建议。第一个建议，在塞浦路斯会议期间，提出了测试坦克的问题，但没人知道如何解决这问题。我的想法是租借坦克。我在论坛上征求意见，很多人赞同。
答：租借？不知道你啥意思。但我知道如何测试坦克。我们需要有个一直开放的公测环境，我们可以在那里测试新坦克和新功能，就像战舰那样。

How bad did the Chieftain armor have to be for them to hold off putting it in?
Just put it in. It's not like this will be the first time they put an underpowered tank in game... and they can always buff it.
-It’s bad enough, T-54 or is-3 can pen turret with regular ammo, not just cupola. You simply cannot tank enemy shells in tier X with this tank. We have enough of glass cannon tanks in the game, why add another?
问：酋长的装甲到底有多糟糕，以至于不能实装？实装吧，又不是第一次把太弱的车放进游戏了。以后总能加强的。
答：有多糟糕？足够糟糕。T-54和IS-3的银币弹能正面击穿炮塔，还不仅仅是指挥塔。这车在10级根本抗不住炮弹。我们已经有足够多的巨炮脆皮车了，干嘛还要再弄一辆。

Wait, did they just say camo paint benefits smaller tanks more??? I thought it was flat based on class - HT 2%, MT and LT 3%, and TDs the highest. How does this actually work? What exactly does the comment mean?
-Percentage is relative value, that’s how. So yes, let’s say you have 100 camo with LT and 3% of said camo is 3. And you have 10 camo in Maus, same 3% is 0.3.
问：他们是不是说过坦克越小，迷彩涂装给的加成越多？我原来以为是一样的，重坦加2%，中坦和轻坦是3%，TD加最多。这是如何做到的？那些评论到底啥意思？
答：百分比表示这是相对的数字，就是这样。假设轻坦有100隐蔽，那么3%就是加3隐蔽。假设鼠爷的隐蔽是10，那么同样3%只有0.3。

WG is planning to take away my female crew with crew redesign?!!
-No, it’s a mission reward, I like female crews :)
问：WG重制乘员系统是不是要把女性乘员移除？
答：不，这是任务奖励，我喜欢女性乘员。