魅族吧 关注:9,060,066贴子:99,179,657

【工匠精神】大家别求820了,看了一下评测

只看楼主收藏回复

820依然发烧,cpu整体水平不如950,功耗高无数,能效奇低,当然也有可能是小米的问题
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10088/xiaomi-mi5-hands-on评测地址,性能测试,被麒麟950吊打(it gets beat by the Mate 8's Kirin 950 SoC.)


IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端1楼2016-02-28 23:21回复
    国外媒体测的,应该不存在造假情况


    IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端2楼2016-02-28 23:22
    回复
      看不到


      IP属地:江西来自Android客户端3楼2016-02-28 23:22
      回复
        “Performance was a large focus-point during the Mi5’s presentation. The Snapdragon 820 is touted to bring a lot of speedup, but this doesn’t seem to materialize as well in most situations. In browser tests, the Mi5 doesn’t seem to be able to deliver much improvement over the performance scoresthat we benchmarked back in December on Qualcomm’s MDP/S platform. Xiaomi’s stock browser doesn’t look like it’s been optimized for the Kryo cores and thus doesn’t represent any improvement over Chrome,which is also testing relatively low versus competing ARM cores in the Snapdargon 810 and Kirin 950.”
        在这几项重要的性能测试中,骁龙820在网页浏览、Flash存储写入、视频播放方面都比麒麟950差,网页浏览得分差了43%,视频播放差了77%!也就是说骁龙820并不快,你刷网页看新闻看八卦都会慢,看视频体验也不好。


        IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端4楼2016-02-28 23:24
        回复
          “Power efficiency of the new SoC was has been a big discussion topic revolving the Snapdragon 820and I know a lot of readers are impatient on new information on the matter, so I took the opportunity to try to measure the power draw of the new Kryo cores on the Mi5. The values presented here are just estimates based on power measurements from the device’s input charge power so there’s likely some voltage converter inefficiency at play and more thorough measurements in the future may result in lower figures.
          We do see some significant improvements for Qualcomm and the Snapdragon 820 represents a substantial reduction in power over the Snapdragon 810 and 808.At first glance though it seems Qualcomm isn’t able to beat HiSilicon’s Kirin 950 in terms of efficiency– although it looks like it will be able to display better efficiency than the Exynos 7420.A bit worrisome was the rather high 1 core power loadbut it’s still too early to determine if this is CPU-core related or rather power from another SoC block.Nevertheless it seems that the Xiaomi Mi5 and other Snapdragon 820 devices should be able show off concrete improvements over last year’s flagship phones.”
          首先来看结论:
          单核:骁龙820的功耗是2.1W(2055mW),麒麟950的功耗是1.4W(1387mW),骁龙820比麒麟950整整多了50%!!
          四核:骁龙820的功耗是4732mW,而麒麟950是3734,骁龙820比麒麟950高30%!而且需要注意的是,骁龙820是只有两个核的频率是2.15GHz,另外两个核的频率1.59GHz,而麒麟950则是4个核都是2.3GHz,频率都比骁龙820高很多,而功耗却低很多,这就是奇迹。也就是说麒麟950的能效比骁龙820高了很多。


          IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端5楼2016-02-28 23:25
          回复


            IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端6楼2016-02-28 23:27
            回复
              高通巅峰期要过了啊!


              来自Android客户端7楼2016-02-28 23:27
              回复
                看来今年820依旧颓势,魅族还是抱紧三星!


                IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端8楼2016-02-28 23:28
                回复
                  单单比一个CPU有个卵用啊!联发科的处理器玩游戏卡谁不知道啊!还有海思的处理器也是。跟高通处理器都不在一个级别上,都不用比的。还有A9也是,gpu都不知道秒了高通几年了,高通又秒联发科几年,海思垫底不用说


                  来自Android客户端9楼2016-02-28 23:39
                  回复
                    楼主怎么不比gpu


                    来自Android客户端10楼2016-02-29 06:06
                    收起回复


                      IP属地:广东来自Android客户端11楼2016-02-29 07:26
                      回复
                        毕竟是820


                        IP属地:山东来自Android客户端12楼2016-02-29 07:27
                        回复
                          我从来就不觉得cpu很好能多牛逼,只要不卡就行了


                          IP属地:四川来自Android客户端13楼2016-02-29 07:34
                          收起回复
                            。。。。


                            IP属地:美国来自Android客户端14楼2016-02-29 07:52
                            回复
                              假新闻。a57和a72差距本来不打的,这个测试差一倍。你当arm无敌了。新核心比老核心厉害这么多。


                              来自Android客户端15楼2016-02-29 07:52
                              回复