阿森纳吧 关注:2,215,917贴子:70,569,988
  • 19回复贴,共1

万能的阿吧,请问这是西方电影或者文学中的什么情节桥段?

只看楼主收藏回复

两次在不同MV中看到
感觉是西方文化经典的桥段,但不知道是哪本书或者电影里的
情节就是一个女人被绑在铁轨上,火车开过来好像要碾死她的样子,女人在那里挣扎
安娜卡列尼娜?我记得安娜不是自己主动卧轨死的吗,好像和这个不太一样望平均文凭水平北大的阿吧吧友道出真相



IP属地:浙江来自Android客户端1楼2016-06-28 16:22回复
    暖暖


    IP属地:山东来自Android客户端2楼2016-06-28 16:53
    回复
      反正不是卡列尼娜 挣扎不说 反正肯定是没法自己绑自己的 哪怕是抖m.


      IP属地:天津来自Android客户端3楼2016-06-28 17:00
      收起回复




        4楼2016-06-28 17:11
        收起回复
          我印象中是不是西部牛仔有这种决斗的方式,两个人分别躺在两条不同的铁轨上,类似与俄罗斯轮盘赌,仅凭印象不一定是真的。。。


          IP属地:山东5楼2016-06-28 17:12
          收起回复
            很多西部片都是这样的吧


            IP属地:上海来自Android客户端6楼2016-06-28 17:14
            收起回复
              Silent Movie Myth: Tied to the Railroad TracksMARCH 12, 2013 FRITZI KRAMER
              Note: This article covers the origins of the trope, how it erroneously became associated with silent films and why the myth persists. For more details on the actors involved, the Snidely Whiplash connection and examples of this trope subverted, check out my follow up article. You can also check out real footage and vintage images in my video response.
              Cut to the chase: This is a myth. The cliche actually had its start in Victorian theater. It was neither common nor expected in silent films.
              “Oh yeah, silent movies. Those are the ones where the villain in a top hat ties a woman to the tracks, right?”
              Those words are sure to get a silent movie fan just a little irritated. (Okay, a lot irritated.) You see, we know that silent movies are rich artistically and have an array of subject matter that is truly impressive. Yet the railroad tracks keep being brought up and the people asking are always curiously specific. The villain must wear a top hat and a mustache as he carries out his crime.
              Know this: In all my years of watching silent films (and I have seen hundreds in every imaginable genre) I have never once seen this cliche in the wild, so to speak. Not once. It’s so rare that when I challenged a large group of silent film buffs to name one occurrence in a serious, mainstream silent feature, no one could do it. Think about that. Thousands of silent films viewed between us and no one could name a single feature.
              I’m still waiting…
              Plus, even if one or two occurrences were to surface, there are still thousands of silent movies that do no such thing. So the cliche can hardly be called “iconic” which is how some critics have described it.
              But I am getting ahead of myself. First thing’s first. How did this misconception get started? Was the cliche ever actually used?
              (I am making the foolish assumption that you are reading this in the spirit of movie scholarship, film trivia or simple curiosity. If this is just a “thing” that you’re into, this article won’t help. Shoo.)
              Origins
              The start of this trope is generally traced back to Augustin Daly’s 1867 play Under the Gaslight. It can be read online here. Here is the pertinent passage, vintage stage direction intact. And please note, for those who notice these things, it is not a damsel but a gentleman in distress.


              7楼2016-06-28 17:18
              回复
                John Augustin Daly (July 20, 1838 – June 7, 1899) was one of the most influential men in American theatre during his lifetime. Drama critic, theatre manager, playwright, and adapter, he became the first recognized stage director in America. He exercised a fierce and tyrannical control over all aspects of his productions. His rules of conduct for actors and actresses imposed heavy fines for late appearances and forgotten lines and earned him the title "the autocrat of the stage."[1] He formed a permanent company in New York and opened Daly's Theatre in New York in 1879 and a second one in London in 1893.[2]


                8楼2016-06-28 17:22
                收起回复