線圖與尺寸數據都來自Firepower-A History Of The American Heavy Tank這本書,網路上能找到的圖大概也都是這份的衍生
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6534f/6534fe20b26b4b21cf65b1cbac11143c23f7e29c" alt=""
以書中車體長度數字去等比縮放線圖,調成1/35長度217mm時,寬度數字也幾乎吻合108mm
所以資料有點雖然老,但還是有所本的...因此雖然不能100%以圖為準,但還是有參考的價值
而以這資料對照TAKOM套件的話,長寬差異不大,大概稍短1mm,稍寬 1mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40631/406311e6827c72a2e4480c9016a1e79a88f42e43" alt=""
(已經盡量用望遠端拍攝,避免透視變型問題)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e172a/e172ad66da2bd0e73b0baebac6fd1a8b1ea372b6" alt=""
砲塔長寬跟圖也差不多,略短1mm左右
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467f2/467f22ff700c624d85b33ff8dc751c943eb9d7aa" alt=""
差異比較多的是砲塔前後弧線,前方寬了,後方窄了,雖然這種弧線的地方線圖比較容易有誤,但不知道TAKOM是否就比較正確? 是反應了現場實測的數據才作成這樣的嗎?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427c7/427c73b3436041345530413ada56930a4d1f529d" alt=""
砲盾也比圖窄了1mm多
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/048fa/048fa93f840d5ec79e963ae5d3b0eb2704d60f93" alt=""
小零件基本上都跟圖差不多
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd052/bd052740d64168a7392bf3a876f0f81ef177e8b7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2901c/2901c670e59cc2450a2d904e80237f5e9bc40908" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d2c3/2d2c35da5b79eabb4c06737599cd4ed585f1a1c5" alt=""
風扇大概也都吻合,只有尖端與線圖有不小的差異,但是比對實車照片感覺零件還原度比較高
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c03f/6c03fcff5768cb0939e5b82bd0c274509ba0832a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d37c/5d37c35e4e49bdae1a167853fe99eaf23c38afd7" alt=""
以上這些TAKOM的表現還算不錯,但是細看砲塔上的弧線變化,就比較多小問題了,後續補上
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6534f/6534fe20b26b4b21cf65b1cbac11143c23f7e29c" alt=""
以書中車體長度數字去等比縮放線圖,調成1/35長度217mm時,寬度數字也幾乎吻合108mm
所以資料有點雖然老,但還是有所本的...因此雖然不能100%以圖為準,但還是有參考的價值
而以這資料對照TAKOM套件的話,長寬差異不大,大概稍短1mm,稍寬 1mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40631/406311e6827c72a2e4480c9016a1e79a88f42e43" alt=""
(已經盡量用望遠端拍攝,避免透視變型問題)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e172a/e172ad66da2bd0e73b0baebac6fd1a8b1ea372b6" alt=""
砲塔長寬跟圖也差不多,略短1mm左右
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467f2/467f22ff700c624d85b33ff8dc751c943eb9d7aa" alt=""
差異比較多的是砲塔前後弧線,前方寬了,後方窄了,雖然這種弧線的地方線圖比較容易有誤,但不知道TAKOM是否就比較正確? 是反應了現場實測的數據才作成這樣的嗎?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427c7/427c73b3436041345530413ada56930a4d1f529d" alt=""
砲盾也比圖窄了1mm多
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/048fa/048fa93f840d5ec79e963ae5d3b0eb2704d60f93" alt=""
小零件基本上都跟圖差不多
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd052/bd052740d64168a7392bf3a876f0f81ef177e8b7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2901c/2901c670e59cc2450a2d904e80237f5e9bc40908" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d2c3/2d2c35da5b79eabb4c06737599cd4ed585f1a1c5" alt=""
風扇大概也都吻合,只有尖端與線圖有不小的差異,但是比對實車照片感覺零件還原度比較高
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c03f/6c03fcff5768cb0939e5b82bd0c274509ba0832a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d37c/5d37c35e4e49bdae1a167853fe99eaf23c38afd7" alt=""
以上這些TAKOM的表現還算不錯,但是細看砲塔上的弧線變化,就比較多小問題了,後續補上
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d0c2/2d0c2c1dd64df48ed490e2ea70ce94a2fbc9383f" alt=""