美军的那些大飞机们~板件比较
由于时间少,产量低,优先做国机的理念,美军大飞机一直处于堆积状态。但不妨碍假组玩玩过过瘾。曾经感觉B-52很大没想到一比较下来变成小鸟依人。几架飞机里Revell的C-17+pe件直做就能有比较好的效果,内构齐全,机尾舱门自由开合。C-5就是个空壳子,内构要自己画图打印,是个大工程。KC-10组合度最差,也同样是个空壳子。同时根据真机大小数据/144量了一下尺寸都还是比较准的,外形也都比较准,值得今后慢慢折腾。data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e25a/6e25adabdc4a912a6aab337c57aaed1eba279193" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff33/dff33ffc5e1b5985947ccb36bdb4a5e67cc05e75" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dd7/43dd746c661fed6fc559a519753c222449273eb6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/910a1/910a1b1b1e7f48a2e797d222696a0103b603545c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c542d/c542d750f7ce83418e0c05a40491140eb1756767" alt=""
由于时间少,产量低,优先做国机的理念,美军大飞机一直处于堆积状态。但不妨碍假组玩玩过过瘾。曾经感觉B-52很大没想到一比较下来变成小鸟依人。几架飞机里Revell的C-17+pe件直做就能有比较好的效果,内构齐全,机尾舱门自由开合。C-5就是个空壳子,内构要自己画图打印,是个大工程。KC-10组合度最差,也同样是个空壳子。同时根据真机大小数据/144量了一下尺寸都还是比较准的,外形也都比较准,值得今后慢慢折腾。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e25a/6e25adabdc4a912a6aab337c57aaed1eba279193" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff33/dff33ffc5e1b5985947ccb36bdb4a5e67cc05e75" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dd7/43dd746c661fed6fc559a519753c222449273eb6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/910a1/910a1b1b1e7f48a2e797d222696a0103b603545c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c542d/c542d750f7ce83418e0c05a40491140eb1756767" alt=""