gives you excellent critical thinking, a bad education takes your time away without giving anything back. While being fully experienced can definitely make you shine! In general, knowledge gain from book has a wide range than that gained from experience, We now live in a world that typophile is no longer exorbitant, and that printed matters are readily available. In libralies, we can learn nearly everything only if we have already acquired basic reading skills, philosophy, history, mathmatics, literature, physics, mathmatics, chemicals, biology,geography, anthropology, and the list will go on. Unlike the experience of an individual that is limited by the range of that individual, books seem to have almost no lamitation. Sitting in the local everywhere library, we virtually can travel everywhere through an interesting geographic encyclopedia, and certainly. with nearly no expense at all. On the other hand, it can be argued that sometimes knowledge gained from experience much deeper and more comprehensive than that gained from books. It is quite true that not everything is contained in books. How to deal with personal finance, how to cope with current social trends, even how to most effectively organize our own mind, and numerous other things can seldom be comprehensively found thoroughly and comprehensively doscussed in books, we have to gain the knowledge by our own experience. And the sad news is that even some knowledge that is contained in books usually needs further comprehension, mainly through experience. answer As to which source is more important, the answer wary. Some knowledge can be acquired only through books. It's hard to imagine we can have a good understanding of history without reading books. On the other hand, some knowledge can be obtained only through experience. learn For instanse, when we try to learn to swim, merely detailed manual of swimming skills, even abundantly filled with illustrations is at most useless. We have to jump into the water and gain the knowledge with experience. We have to use books and experience as source simultaneously to get what we want to know. Take learning physics for example, both books and experience are equally significance sources, and of course, example of such are numerous. Therefore, I think whether one source is more important than other depends on circumstance Now we are living in a dazzling world where knowledge is accumulating at an astonishing speed. However, among the numerous means of gaining knowledge, books and experiences are the most effective and normal. As to which is more important,I hold the view that it depends on the circumstances. To begin with, knowledge from books has a wider range than that from experience. For printed materials are not exorbitant any more, as long as people acquire the skill of reading, the books cover all kinds then open its door to the knowledge hunters. Philosophy, chemistry, mathematics, politics, so on so forth. But experiences only limited in the certain field of individuals. In addition, some particular knowledge can be only acquired from books. It is hard to imagine history learners can master their study well without reading books. On the other hand, knowledge gained from experience is considered to be deeper and more comprehensive. It is quite true that we can not learn all sorts of things from book. For example, how to deal with relationships with people around, how to cope with personal finance, how to control your own mind, and numerous other things like that. Moreover, even some knowledge contained in books will need further comprehension, which is mainly through experience. Not until a swimming learner jump into the water will he gain the skill. Despite the abundance books with exact illustration books he reads. Especially for college students, when they are becoming senior students, they may be required to leave the ivory tower and step into the society to do some internship related to their major. That's why experience is playing a vital position in the process of learning. In general, knowledge gained from books and that from experience should go hand in hand in order to reach the perfect outcome. Sometime, book knowledge is the fundament. For instance, a students majored in physics should have a solid knowledge background first which is gained from the books, and do some research and experiment in the lab so as to gain further understanding, which are from the experience. To sum up, both sources are equally important, whether one source means more depends on the different circumstance. Of all the knowledge we have,