伤心坎特吧 关注:1,717贴子:6,648
  • 2回复贴,共1

安格斯·麦迪森(Angus Maddison)给出的中国GDP数据

取消只看楼主收藏回复

安格斯·麦迪森(Angus Maddison),当代最伟大的经济历史数据考证与分析专家,现为荷兰格罗宁根大学的荣誉退休教授以及剑桥大学赛尔温学院的荣誉院士。麦迪森教授曾经担 任过很多国家政府的经济顾问,其中包括巴西、加纳、希腊以及巴基斯坦。由于他的研究兴趣,他曾经到访过很多发展中国家。他目前主要的研究兴趣是影响各国长 期经济发展的因素,焦点是经济史的计量分析和国际比较。



IP属地:河北1楼2010-05-15 11:21回复
    List of regions by past GDP (PPP)
    1 1st century
    Han China      26 820      26.2  
    2 1000
    Song China      26 550      22.7
    3 1500
    Ming China      61 800      25.0  
    4 1600
    Ming China      96 000      29.2  
    5 1700
    Qing China      82 800      22.3  
    6 1820
    Qing China      228 600      32.9  
    7 1870
    Qing China      189 740      17.2  
    8 1913
    Republic of China      241 344      8.9  
    9 1950
    People's Republic of China      239 903      4.5  
    10 1973
    People's Republic of China      740 048      4.6  
    11 1998
    Republic of India      1 702 712      5.0  
    List of regions by past GDP (PPP)


    IP属地:河北3楼2010-05-16 18:40
    回复
      These are lists of regions and countries sorted by their estimated real gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), the value of all final goods and services produced within a country/region in a given year. GDP dollar (international dollar) estimates here are derived from PPP estimates.
      In some of these lists, the term country corresponds to the geographical region of the country being referred to, not the country itself. Most of the information below is based on estimates by economic historian Angus Maddison, former professor at University of Groningen and assistant director of the economics development division for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, in his work The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Estimates are for the periods from the 1st century to 1998, with figures in millions of international dollars, and shares of world GDP are also given.
      Maddison' assumptions have been criticized and admired by academics and journalists. Bryan Haig, who has characterized Maddison's figures for 19th century Australia as "inaccurate and irrelevant"[1], by John Caldwell, in whose assessment Maddison's arguments have a "dangerous circularity"[2], by W. W. Rostow, according to whom, "This excessive macroeconomic bias also causes him (Maddison) to mis-date, in my view, the beginning of what he calls the capitalist era at 1820 rather than, say, the mid-1780s[3], and by W. J. MacPherson who has described Maddison's work on India and Pakistan of using "dubious comparative data."[4]
      Economist and Journalist Evan Davis has praised Maddison's research by citing it as a "fantastic publication" and that it was "based on the detailed scholarship of the world expert on historical economic data Angus Maddison." He also added that "One shouldn't read the book in the belief the statistics are accurate to 12 decimal places."[5]
      NicholasD.Kristof:Glory      is as ephemeral as smoke and clouds 


      IP属地:河北4楼2010-05-16 18:40
      回复