恬梦酣吧 关注:129贴子:12,894

【特设】英语作文批改专用楼

只看楼主收藏回复

以后我就把自己写的作文贴到这个楼里面了
请作文老师们多多关照
@fonda0908 @史提夫23 @卖萌的触手 谢谢啦


1楼2013-04-04 16:05回复
    题目:Some people think that goverment should pay for the health care and education.Do you agree or disagree?

    开头段:With the advance in society,health care and education will attract more andmore attention in the future.some people think that goverment should shoulder the responsibility of paying these issues,some people hold a point that it will weakens goverment's ability to pay for other public service,such as criminal and science.


    本楼含有高级字体2楼2013-04-04 16:17
    收起回复
      第二段:As for me,I argue that paying for health care and education is an efficent methodology to promote people's living standands.


      3楼2013-04-04 16:19
      回复
        第三段:Initially,in some areas,poverty is still a serious problem that people can not ignore,individuals here suffer from hunger and dieases everyday not to mention spending sufficient money to enjoy decent medical service and qualified schooling.Govermental assistance can guarantee a essential standard of life for these people,especially the needy.Moreover,the amount of sick and illiterate will be plumment,which can boost social development substantially as well.


        4楼2013-04-04 16:27
        回复
          第四段:Nevertheless,some experts argue that the expenditures will give pressure onlimited national budget,money saved can be allocated to address other society urgencies,among which are traffic jam and environmental pollution.These fields consume less and effect better,compared with the project about health care and education.It sounds like a reasonable explanation,but traffic jam and environmental pollution are great issues in urban areas.If goverment always take policies to improve citizen's living standards,the qualified life of low-incoming people will not be guaranteed,that will give negative influence on striking the right balance between the rich and the poor.


          5楼2013-04-04 16:37
          回复
            第五段:From the above-mentioned discussion,it is worthwhile to give top priority to the health care and education.
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`


            6楼2013-04-04 16:39
            回复
              看不懂


              IP属地:北京7楼2013-04-04 17:56
              回复
                With the advance in society,health care and education will attract more andmore attention in the future.some people think that goverment should shoulder the responsibility of paying these issues,some people hold a point that it will weakens goverment's ability to pay for other public service,such as criminal and science。
                ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                With the advance in society,health care and education will attract more and more attention in the future. Some people think that gover(n)ment should shoulder the responsibility of paying (for) these issues,some people hold a point that it will weaken(s) gover(n)ment's ability to pay for other public service(s),such as criminal (justice) and science.


                8楼2013-04-04 18:52
                收起回复
                  第二段:As for me,I argue that paying for health care and education is an efficent methodology to promote people's living standands.
                  --------------------------------------
                  第二段:As for me,I argue that paying for health care and education is an (effcient) methodology to (improve) people's living (standards).


                  9楼2013-04-04 18:56
                  收起回复
                    题目:Some people think that gover(n)ment should pay for the health care and education. Do you agree or disagree?


                    10楼2013-04-04 19:13
                    回复
                      回复@fonda0908 :没有机考 全部纸质试卷


                      来自iPhone客户端11楼2013-04-04 20:11
                      收起回复
                        第四段:Nevertheless,some experts argue that the expenditures will give pressure onlimited national budget,money saved can be allocated to address other society urgencies,among which are traffic jam and environmental pollution.These fields consume less and effect better,compared with the project about health care and education.It sounds like a reasonable explanation,but traffic jam and environmental pollution are great issues in urban areas.If goverment always take policies to improve citizen's living standards,the qualified life of low-incoming people will not be guaranteed,that will give negative influence on striking the right balance between the rich and the poor.
                        ----------------------------------------------------------------
                        我试著改成下面这段给你参考:
                        On the other hand, some experts claim that the expenditures will put more pressure on the already strained national budget. They believe that it will be more cost effective to spend money on other urgent social issues such as traffic jam and environmental pollution. While this might sound like a reasonable argument, we should not ignore the fact that these issues occur mainly in urban areas. If the government wants to improve the overall standard of living for the citizens, it should put more emphasis on the health care and education, which will not only benefit low-income people but ultimately help narrow the gap between the rich and poor as well.


                        IP属地:中国台湾15楼2013-04-07 12:59
                        收起回复